[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Possible security hole? [was: verify_area(...) possible problem]
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> This is a known problem, it is pretty much similar to what happened
> under 2.0 for all all architectures, not just the i386 and one of
> reasons for the new user space access stuff introduced from 2.1.4 on.
> Now that only the 386 is still affected just nobody bothered because
> on the 386 there are other funnies left which may make running a
> system used by possibly hostile users a bad idea.

I haven't seen any security warnings against using a 386 for multiple
users. Should there be one?

Perhaps it would be possible to construct a patch which does this on a 386:

- Implement read-write semaphores.
- access_ok() grabs the mm semaphore, read-only, and sets a flag.
- On exit from system call, if the flag is set it is cleared,
and the mm read-only semaphore is released.
- The page fault handler uses the read-only semaphore, otherwise

-- Jamie

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.059 / U:9.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site