Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Mar 1999 22:00:28 +0100 | From | Ronald Meijerink <> | Subject | Re: PROBLEM: SCSI with 2 controlers.. |
| |
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 12:00:41AM -0500, Jay.Estabrook@digital.com wrote: >
Hello Jay,
> >>> Ronald Meijerink said: > > > > It looks like what you said is correct placed the scsi card in another slot > > an this computer is up and running with 2.2.3-ac4 > > Good! But I still wish I understood why it wanted the second SCSI to use > IRQ 14. I'll look at -ac4 and see if it has changed something that causes > that to happen... > I don't know i didn't alter anything in srm mode so as i know the boards should be the same i have 3 axpci33 2 in mij servers and 1 backup (if one breaks)....
> > but is stil have one small > > problem with the fileserver (this was the cdrom server). this one has 3 scsi > > and i use the ide port for aan harddisk the info... > > irq 3: 1 irq 9: 747110 53c7,8xx > > irq 4: 1 irq 10: 8 53c7,8xx > > irq 5: 17126924 3c509 irq 11: 8 53c7,8xx > > irq 6: 3 irq 14: 473898 ide0 > > This looks like you configured the 2.2.3-ac4 with the 53c7,8xx driver, while > the older 2.1.130 kernel was using the ncr53c8xx driver. The latter > (ncr53c8xx) is much preferred over the other. > An oeps on mij part i see that i put 2 outputs from differt kernels in this message.. but in the 2.2.3-ac4 i did use the ncr53c8xx driver..
hda: QUANTUM FIREBALL EX6.4A, ATA DISK drive ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hda: QUANTUM FIREBALL EX6.4A, 6149MB w/418kB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63 Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 2.88M FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306 ncr53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 6, function 0 ncr53x8xx: 53c810 deteced ncr53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 8, function 0 ncr53c8xx: PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE not set, features based on CACHE LINE SIZE not used. ncr53c8xx: 53c810a detected ncr53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 11, function 0 ncr53c8xx: PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE not set, features based on CACHE LINE SIZE not used. ncr53c8xx: 53c810a detected ncr53c810-0: rev=0x01, base=0x4200000, io_port=0x8000, irq=11 ncr53c810-0: ID 7, Fast-10, Parity Checking ncr53c810-0: restart (scsi reset). ncr53c810a-1: rev=0x12, base=0x4201000, io_port=0x8800, irq=10 ncr53c810a-1: ID 7, Fast-10, Parity Checking ncr53c810a-1: restart (scsi reset). ncr53c810a-2: rev=0x12, base=0x4202000, io_port=0x9000, irq=13 ncr53c810a-2: ID 7, Fast-10, Parity Checking scsi0 : ncr53c8xx - revision 3.1h scsi1 : ncr53c8xx - revision 3.1h scsi2 : ncr53c8xx - revision 3.1h scsi : 3 hosts scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid, scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00 ncr53c8xx_abort: pid=14 serial_number=29 serial_number_at timeout=29
And then it just does nothing at least in the 20 minutes it i needed to type this over from the other computer..
Is it posable that on the ncr53c810a-2 irq 13 not the best irq because on the other kernels it runs up 9,10,11 with the 2.1.130 kernel strange.
After looking around in the readme from the scsi driver that it is not posable to set irq's enz..
> What exactlyis happening on the second machine? I didn't see any errois > in the log you included... > Wel see above but on the extra 2 scsi controlers there is no hardware.
Gr. Ronald Meijerink
> --Jay++ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > American Non Sequitur Society: we don't make sense, but we do like pizza... > > Jay A Estabrook Alpha Motherboards - LINUX Project > Compaq Computer Corporation (508) 841-3241 or (DTN) 237-3241 > 334 South Street, Shrewsbury, MA 01545 Jay.Estabrook@digital.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |