Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:09:39 +0100 (CET) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: breaking the 2Gigabyte limit on 32 bit arch of inode->i_size (off_t vs loff_t) |
| |
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
>for, why not base which is used off of that? Or does doing it these different >ways cause incompatible filesystems? Also, if possible it would be nice for
The disk side is indipended by the fact that the arch is 32bit or 64bit based. The disk just now in ext2 handle inode sizes of 64bit, the problem in x86 is that we are not using the high part of the inode size information stored on disk.
Andrea Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |