Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:50:58 -0600 (CST) | From | Shaun Wilson <> | Subject | Re: [patch] drivers/net/plip.c |
| |
> I meant what I meant was that nothing should stop us from added a > different protocol. The name could even be changed if that's an issue. > A DMA capable, 8 bit PLIP-like would be much nicer, but the lack of a > standard cable might be a show stopper.
Not in this apartment. I suggested this, but.. I would liek to see it happen, and would offer any assitance to see it does.
> Interrupt for each byte? ~50 kHz interrupts would require a pretty > low latency, or am I missing your point?
sync-on-intr in respect to teh fact that when the sender wants to send a packet he would send a line inter. If you're about to send and you get an inter it will have to be requeued.
Or maybe I'm missing a point :) ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |