lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: Reiserfs is order of magnitude faster for fsyncof large files than ext2
Date
>> sync interval of 20-30 seconds, I'd expect you would seldom dirty more than
>> 1% of a large file within a minute unless you were in the midst of truly
>> torrid activity (which would be a totally separate test case).

And in this case fsync's are rather seldom, since neighter log-appends nor
database transaction logs are accessed randomly. The only trouble with them
are the indirect blocks and inode informations. I dont now much applications
which fsync on large files which are dirtied all over the place.

Greetings
Bernd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.168 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site