Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Oct 1999 12:32:19 -0500 | From | Michael Elizabeth Chastain <> | Subject | Re: A small bug with CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL |
| |
> The reasoning looks correct to me, and I just used fgrep to analyse > the entire 2.3.22 tree, with the ones you pointed out being the only > naked ones I came across.
Thanks Riley.
> - if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" != "n" ]; then > + if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
All the interpreters have been fixed so that they handle != "n" properly (this was non-trivial because variables have the empty value "" if they are not initialized). So these constructions are OK.
Michael
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |