Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:48:46 +0000 | From | Steve Dodd <> | Subject | Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question) |
| |
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 02:57:28PM -0800, Jon M. Taylor wrote:
> That is IMHO a bad idea. Linux, because it follows the > traditional Unix monolithic kernel model, is already so obsolete that it > really isn't worth putting serious time into incompatible API > improvements.
Hmm, I don't know. Forking one of {Linux,{Free,Net,Open}BSD} or some other Open Source OS and redoing the API and some of the guts in a better way without being backwardly compatible has its advantages. I agree that 'monolithic' is on its way out, but very slowly. A monolothic kernel with a new API would be an interesting and useful 'toy' even if it never hit the mainstream. It would also be a good way of testing API features for future more advanced OSs, as monolithic kernels have the advantage of (relative) simplicity and widespread comprehension.
S.
-- %DCL-MEM-BAD, bad memory VMS-F-PDGERS, pudding between the ears
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |