[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectclone() and dl library incompatible?

Following is a simple example that works when the dl library isn't involved
at link time, but fails when it is.

Here are relevant versions:

Linux 2.0.34 #1 Fri May 8 16:05:57 EDT 1998 i586 unknown

Here's how to reproduce the problem:

1. Make a file called ctest.c, containing:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <schedbits.h>

foo( void *arg )
fprintf( stderr, "in foo, pid = %d\n", getpid() );
sleep( 2 );

void *stk = malloc( 1024 * 1024 );

clone( foo, stk, CLONE_VM | CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGHAND, 0 );

fprintf( stderr, "in main, pid = %d\n", getpid() );
sleep( 2 );

2. Make a file called csub.c, containing:

#include <dlfcn.h>

int call_sub()
dlopen( "somefile", RTLD_LAZY );
return 0;

3. Make sure that LD_LIBRARY_PATH contains the current directory

4. Compile, link, and run to show that it there is no problem with clone()
when the dl library is not involved:

cc -c csub.c
ld -shared -o csub.o
cc -o ctest ctest.c -L. -lcsub

(You will see:
in main, pid = xxx
in foo, pid = xxx+1)

5. recompile, relink, and rerun to show that clone() fails when the dl
library is involved:

cc -c -DWILL_BREAK_CLONE csub.c
ld -shared -o csub.o -ldl

(You will see:
in main, pid = xxx) - the cloned thread will have died before running foo...

I would appreciate any information that would help me get around this...



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.033 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site