![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 18 Sep 1998, Nathan Hand wrote: > The other obvious reason that SCO wants UDI to succeed is that Linux > has tonnes of drivers and SCO does not, and SCO wants to invent some > plausible way of leeching off the Linux drivers. > Of course, I am just being argumentative, because I actually support > UDI, because it will let me install Solaris on more hardware, and it > will help UNIX in general (even if not specifically Linux). Currently, the main (management) argument against Unix is: "You're in a maze of twisty Unices, all incompatible." With ia64 and UDI the Unix vendors (seem to) want to change that to: "You're in a maze of twisty Unices, all interchangeable." Once we reach that last situation, Unix _will_ once again have a major non-techical selling point; _the_ selling point that is now used against Unix by non-technical folks in management and sales... All in all, it will save a lot of sysadmins ;) Rik. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl | | Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||