lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)
Date
Followup to:  <199808061810.OAA00880@jupiter.cs.uml.edu>
By author: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> >> getting, *long wait* that it might have sounded like. I meant that little
> >> bit of time spent is unnecessary. Bigger deal for some than others, no?
> >
> > You really don' t understand that the inode lookup time is not an issue.
> > Please really stop using it as and argument in favor of devfs.
>
> No, you don't understand. It has nothing to do with "ls /dev".
>
> Many programs need to search through /dev. That includes lilo, the
> whole procps package, stuff related to the talk daemon, etc.
>
> That's not even the worst of it. Every time you open a pty, you need
> access /dev. Every time you want /dev/null or /dev/zero, you access /dev.
>
> The result: general system slowdown. You can't point a finger at
> the problem ("we lost 23 seconds RIGHT THERE because /dev was slow")
> but you suffer anyway.
>
> Hey, Linus! It looks like a latency problem.
>

This is what the dcache is for.

-hpa
--
PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/
"To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.062 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site