lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

    Andrea Arcangeli writes:
    > On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Shawn Leas wrote:
    >
    >> In saying waiting, I wasn't meaning the human style foot tapping, coffee
    >> getting, *long wait* that it might have sounded like. I meant that little
    >> bit of time spent is unnecessary. Bigger deal for some than others, no?
    >
    > You really don' t understand that the inode lookup time is not an issue.
    > Please really stop using it as and argument in favor of devfs.

    No, you don't understand. It has nothing to do with "ls /dev".

    Many programs need to search through /dev. That includes lilo, the
    whole procps package, stuff related to the talk daemon, etc.

    That's not even the worst of it. Every time you open a pty, you need
    access /dev. Every time you want /dev/null or /dev/zero, you access /dev.

    The result: general system slowdown. You can't point a finger at
    the problem ("we lost 23 seconds RIGHT THERE because /dev was slow")
    but you suffer anyway.

    Hey, Linus! It looks like a latency problem.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.029 / U:59.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site