Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Jul 1998 15:41:07 -0700 (PDT) | From | Gerhard Mack <> | Subject | Re: Strange interrupt behaviour |
| |
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, Alex Buell wrote: > I'm now finding that after about 7 days' of uptime, this Linux box [P75 + > 16MB] actually gets slower than Win95. I'm not kidding. It's getting to > the point where I am contemplating dumping 2.1.x and going back to 2.0.35.
I'd like to see you compare that to a 95 machine that's been up 7 days.
> And that brings me to a nasty thought I've been having lately. What if we > have been infiltrated by covert Microsoft agents intent on sabotaging the > Linux project? I have seen the problems that you've had with the Linux > kernel by integrating bad source code that was given to you. [2.1.44 comes > to mind]
I do beleve that's why Linus goes through the patchs. I reccomend cutting back on the cannabis for a slightly more clear headed approach.
Gerhard
-- Gerhard Mack irc admin voyager.starchat.net
gmack@imag.net innerfire@starchat.net
As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |