Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Mar 1998 04:06:25 -0500 (EST) | From | <> | Subject | Re: GGI Project Unhappy On Linux |
| |
WOW! This.. This is concise!
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Vagn Scott wrote:
> Manuel J. Galan wrote: > > Maybe instead of bloating the kernel with more and more services, > > it would be wiser to unload it as much as possible keeping the > > bare essentials? > > Exactly. > The bare essentials should go in the kernel. > > There is a problem. > The Xservers are crashing systems. > > There is a solution. > Put the bare essentials into the kernel so that > Xservers can be written which don't crash systems. > > There is a project. > The project is GGI. > One tiny part of the project is KGI. > GGI is big. > KGI is small. > Only KGI is going into the kernel. > GGI is not going into the kernel. > Big bad GGI is NOT going into the kernel. > Only tiny little bare essential KGI is going in the kernel. > > KGI is going into the kernel because Xservers crash systems. > KGI is inevitable because Xservers crash systems. > KGI isn't going away because there are no other proposals to > deal with the problem that Xservers crash systems. > > X is nice. > There will be a KGI because X is nice. > Those who say we don't need a KGI because we have X are > talking nonsense. > We need KGI because we need X. > A particular kind of X. > An X that doesn't crash systems. > > If you need X then you need KGI. > > If you disagree with that, and expect to be taken > seriously by GGI/KGI supporters, then propose another > solution to the problem that Xservers crash systems. > > If you can't solve that problem then please get out > of the way of the people who can. > -- > _~|__ > >@ (vagn( / > \`-ooooooooo-'/ > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |