lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 3rd Party Patches / patches directory

> Is it too much to expect people to look at a web page on the off-chance
> that somebody has written a patch to do what they need to do?

Hmm - I guess you are right and it's not needed to really include it with
the kernel. But imo there are two importand things:

1.) This is _NOT_ thought for bugfixes. Most patch collections I know are
full with bugfixes (and most of this bugs are allready fixed in the
newest version - or the patch does not apply to the newest kernel).
The idea is to have a collection of patches they extend the kernel in
some way (like adding devfs, RT sheduling or more possible processes).

2.) It should be the _official_ site for this stuff - reffered by the
Documentation which comes with the kernel. Otherwise there will be
with time more than just one such site. I don't post my patches to
the existing pages becouse there are so many that it's not possible
to keep all of them up-to-date. If there would be one official kernel
patch archive it would be much easier for me to keep the entry there
up to date all the time and I would use it ...

- clifford

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Clifford Wolf (CEO and CTO)
The ROCK Projects Workgoup IRC: IRCnet / clifford
http://www.rock-projects.com/ http://www.clifford.at/
e-mail: c.wolf@rock-projects.com email: god@clifford.at


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.078 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site