Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Anatomy of a sigset_t. | Date | Wed, 10 Dec 1997 10:09:18 +0100 | From | Alex Priem <> |
| |
"C. Scott Ananian" writes:
>People are complaining about code breakage with the new sigset_t. >Correctly written code should *not* have problems. >But I thought I'd take us all on a quick tour of signal.h to explain >what's changed, and why it doesn't (shouldn't) matter --- and why some >programs written by lousy programmers break.
Err, could you tell me why sigemptyset and sigfillset are missing in the `new' signal stuff? It looks like we're using old-style sigemptyset on the new-style signal structs.
Alex
| |