Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
>> Changes from v8:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707081351.1680209-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
>> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch.
>
> Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply
> series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3)
> and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other
> maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel
> (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different
> branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what
> for-next/core is, as the name implies).
>

The reason is that these two patches create conflicts. Since this series
involves file movement, resolving those conflicts was not
straightforward. Therefore, I rebased the series on top of both of the
following commits:

commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use migrate_disable() for attestation token requests")
commit e62decaf98e7 ("arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform")

-aneesh