On Mon,  3 Aug 2026 20:16:52 +0000 Thaison Phan wrote:
>      def _setter_lines(self, ri, member, presence):
> -        return [f"{presence} = len;",
> -                f"{member} = malloc({presence});",
> +        return [f"{member} = malloc(len);",
> +                f"if (!{member})",
> +                "return;",
> +                f"{presence} = len;",
>                  f'memcpy({member}, {self.c_name}, {presence});']

Silently eating errors in setters does not seem great, better to crash
and make it clear than things are not working than have a silently
misconfigured system?

AI also points out that setters are preceded by a free (in case we're
replacing existing attr, multiple sets on a single attr are allowed)
So if alloc fails we'll end up with NULL ptr and len from previous
allocation.

Maybe tackle the setters in a separate patch, and keep patch 2 scoped
to the easier case?
-- 
pw-bot: cr