Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:08:19 +0100 | | From | Catalin Marinas <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/mm: Simplify SWIOTLB setup in arch_mm_preinit() |
| |
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:05:20AM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote: > At the moment, arch_mm_preinit() checks if the system has limited > addressing or is running under CCA to enable SWIOTLB, only after to > be forced to true anyway if it was false due to > CONFIG_DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC being unconditionally true for > arm64. > > Simplify this logic, by making it clear that SWIOTLB is always used > but its size depends on the address layout of the system. > > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com> > --- > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 11 ++++------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 97987f850a33..fcc9c05a8fe6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -336,25 +336,22 @@ void __init arch_setup_zero_pages(void) > void __init arch_mm_preinit(void) > { > unsigned int flags = SWIOTLB_VERBOSE; > - bool swiotlb = max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit); > + bool limited_addressing = max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit); > > if (is_realm_world()) { > - swiotlb = true; > flags |= SWIOTLB_FORCE; > - } > - > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC) && !swiotlb) { > + } else if (!limited_addressing) {
I'm fine with implementing Mike's comment on doing the check inline.
I recall some people still comment out the dma kmalloc bounce option:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/a07564753639fe5ffb3f59d7364f14e6e68e3e9e
(there was no way I could convince them it's worse memory wastage without the option)
So happy to make it slightly harder for them ;).
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|  |