Messages in this thread |  | | From | Aneesh Kumar K.V <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform | | Date | Thu, 04 Jun 2026 14:29:00 +0530 |
| |
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com> writes:
> pKVM does support memory encryption, expose that to the rest of > the kernel through cc_platform_has() > > At the moment, all devices inside the guest are emulated which > requires its memory to be shared back to the host (decrypted), so > set force_dma_unencrypted() to always return true. > > Although, typically pKVM guests rely on restricted-dma-pools to > bounce traffic, with this change, it is possible to solely rely on > the default SWIOTLB for that (assuming the appropriate size is set > from the command line) > > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com> > --- > This change is critical for the ongoing refactoring of the DMA-API[1] > that will break protected guests under pKVM with this patch. That is > due to this rework will make the state of the SWIOTLB and restricted > dma pools depends on the value returned by cc_platform_has() > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260522042815.370873-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org/ > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 3 ++- > arch/arm64/kernel/rsi.c | 12 ------------ > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c | 3 +++ > 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hypervisor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hypervisor.h > index a12fd897c877..8889a0ba1ec5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hypervisor.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hypervisor.h > @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ > #define _ASM_ARM64_HYPERVISOR_H > > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h> > +#include <linux/jump_label.h> > + > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(pkvm_guest); > > void kvm_init_hyp_services(void); > bool kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(u32 func_id); > @@ -10,8 +13,18 @@ void kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void); > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_PKVM_GUEST > void pkvm_init_hyp_services(void); > + > +static inline bool is_protected_kvm_guest(void) > +{ > + return static_branch_unlikely(&pkvm_guest); > +} > #else > static inline void pkvm_init_hyp_services(void) { }; > + > +static inline bool is_protected_kvm_guest(void) > +{ > + return false; > +} > #endif > > static inline void kvm_arch_init_hyp_services(void) >
...
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c > index d66291def0f4..26fe9c3f22e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c > +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <asm/hypervisor.h> > > static size_t pkvm_granule; > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE_RO(pkvm_guest); >
Do we need EXPORT_SYMBOL on this?
> > static int arm_smccc_do_one_page(u32 func_id, phys_addr_t phys) > { > @@ -120,4 +121,6 @@ void pkvm_init_hyp_services(void) > > if (kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_MMIO_GUARD)) > arm64_ioremap_prot_hook_register(&mmio_guard_ioremap_hook); > + > + static_branch_enable(&pkvm_guest); > } > -- > 2.54.0.1032.g2f8565e1d1-goog
-aneesh
|  |