Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 9 May 2026 21:36:16 -0300 | | From | Jason Gunthorpe <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] dma-mapping: Use DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED through direct, pool and swiotlb paths |
| |
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:28:11PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> That said, does CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT actually make more sense than > CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT throughout this series? We'd need to change arm64 > realms as well to use this one.
It is often quite confusing in the DMA API and iommu what is guest logic and what is host logic, so this does sound nice. AFAIK none of this forced bouncing, T=1 or CC_SHARED logic applies to host in the DMA API.
Jason
|  |