Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 7 May 2026 11:56:58 +0200 | | From | Steffen Klassert <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v8 04/14] xfrm: fix NAT-related field inheritance in SA migration |
| |
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > 2026-05-05, 06:32:43 +0200, Antony Antony wrote: > > During SA migration via xfrm_state_clone_and_setup(), > > nat_keepalive_interval was silently dropped and never copied to the new > > SA. mapping_maxage was unconditionally copied even when migrating to a > > non-encapsulated SA. > > mapping_maxage should be harmless (0/unused on non-encap), but I think > migrating nat_keepalive_interval should be considered a fix: > > Fixes: f531d13bdfe3 ("xfrm: support sending NAT keepalives in ESP in UDP states") > > (maybe even split out of this series, but that would cause a conflict > with the previous patch)
Can this be backported without the previous patches? If not, we might need to split it out.
|  |