Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 6 May 2026 10:06:34 -0700 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] x86,fs/resctrl: Pave the way for MPAM counter assignment | | From | Reinette Chatre <> |
| |
Hi Boris,
On 5/6/26 9:56 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 08:58:07AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> Ben is not rushing this work and has indeed been patiently addressing feedback. >> I considered this series to indeed be close to ready during the previous >> cycle but instead of rushing the polishing was left for this cycle. >> >> v7 closely followed v6 since we felt v6 was ready for inclusion but contained >> an unfortunate typo (missing a "---" in changelog). v7 was thus submitted shortly to >> ensure we pass a clean series to x86 maintainers for consideration. > > Yap, I saw all that. > >> This is an instance where a brand new reviewer appears to a series after all patches have >> RB tag. I welcome and appreciate all reviews and it would be great to see more such >> collaboration to general resctrl and earlier in review cycles. In this case I do not >> believe this criticism about this work being half-baked and rushed is justified. > > I think you're misunderstanding me. My response was to Babu in an attempt to > correct his thinking that somehow patches should be rushed before a merge > window.
I did misunderstand. My apologies.
> > People tend to do that in front of merge windows and I'm replying to that > sentiment in the hope that as many people as possible read that and understand > that rushing patches never works and is never good.
ack.
> > It didn't have anything to do with Ben's patchset - it *just* happened to be > on that thread only. > > As a matter of fact, I started applying his v7 but was waiting for Sashiko to > finish reviewing it.
Thank you very much for considering this series.
> > I hope this makes the whole thing more clear.
It does. Thank you very much.
Reinette
|  |