Messages in this thread |  | | From | Miquel Raynal <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: fix condition in 'nand_select_target()' | | Date | Tue, 05 May 2026 10:23:55 +0200 |
| |
On 05/05/2026 at 11:14:25 +03, Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@rulkc.org> wrote:
> 05.05.2026 11:10, Miquel Raynal wrote: >> On 05/05/2026 at 10:59:16 +03, Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@rulkc.org> wrote: >> >>> 05.05.2026 10:50, Miquel Raynal wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 05/05/2026 at 01:10:12 +03, Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@rulkc.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Two important typos in the commit log :-) >>>> >>>>> 'cs' here must in range [0:nanddev_ntargets). >>>> be [ >>> >>> Hi, sorry, You mean? >>> >>> >>> 'cs' here must be in range [0:nanddev_ntargets]. >> I meant [0:nanddev_ntargets[ which is the mathematical way, IIRC, to >> indicate that the last value is out of scope/excluded. >> >> [0:nanddev_ntargets] means that nanddev_ntargets is included in the >> scope of values and here since you are explicitly showing that it is >> not, it feels wrong to use that convention. > > > Ahh, Yes I see, just small misunderstood in math symbols: > > I mean: [A:B) == [A:B[ > > https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/0719b1b08cdf649e735e6dab6dc7355fa37a9b21
Ah ok, didn't know that other convention, fine then, take the one you prefer if both are identical. Just add the missing "be" please!
Thanks, Miquèl
|  |