Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 18 May 2026 17:17:09 +1000 | | Subject | Re: [RFC 3/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-mcf: do not use readl()/writel() on ColdFire | | From | Greg Ungerer <> |
| |
Hi Angelo,
On 18/5/26 05:00, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 12:26:46AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: >> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> >> >> The implementation of the readX() and writeX() family of IO access >> functions is non-standard on ColdFire platforms. They check the supplied >> IO address and will return either big or little endian results based on >> that check. This is non-standard, they are expected to always return >> little-endian byte ordered data. Unfortunately this behavior also means >> that ioreadX()/iowroteX() and their big-endian counter parts >> ioreadXbe()/iowriteXbe() are wrong. This is now in the process of being >> cleaned up and fixed. >> >> Change the use of the readX() and writeX() access functions in this driver >> to use the recently defined specific ColdFire internal SoC hardware IO >> access functions mcf_read8()/mcf_read16()/mcf_read32() and >> mcf_write8()/mcf_write16()/mcf_write32(). >> >> There is no functional change to the driver. Though it does have the >> effect of making the IO access slightly more efficient, since there is >> no longer a need to do the address check at every register access. >> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> [snip] > > Tested this now on stmark2, sdcard mount/umount/read/write/erase works > as usual. Thanks. > > Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@baylibre.com> > Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@baylibre.com>
Fantastic, thanks testing.
Regards Greg
|  |