Messages in this thread |  | | From | Heiko Stuebner <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi-qp: Add HDMI 2.0 SCDC scrambling and high TMDS clock ratio support | | Date | Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:49:09 +0200 |
| |
Am Sonntag, 26. April 2026, 02:20:17 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea: > Enable HDMI 2.0 display modes (e.g. 4K@60Hz) by adding SCDC management > for the high TMDS clock ratio and scrambling, required when the TMDS > character rate exceeds the 340 MHz HDMI 1.4b limit. > > A periodic work item monitors the sink's scrambling status to recover > from sink-side resets. On hotplug detect, if SCDC scrambling state is > out of sync with the driver, trigger a CRTC reset to re-establish the > link. > > Reject modes requiring TMDS rates above 600 MHz, as those fall in the > HDMI 2.1 FRL domain which is not supported. In no_hpd configurations, > further restrict to 340 MHz since SCDC requires a connected sink. > > Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com> > Tested-by: Maud Spierings <maud_spierings@hotmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c > index d649a1cf07f5..c482a8e7da25 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > /* > * Copyright (c) 2021-2022 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd. > * Copyright (c) 2024 Collabora Ltd. > + * Copyright (c) 2025 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
I have no real clue about the inner workings of hdmi, but that line does make me curious, because no part of the patch authorship does mention Amazon ;-) .
Also I think "or it's affiliates" might be way too broad, because this can be essentially everyone. So noone in the future will know who to ask on copyright questions.
Similarly when _somebody_ comes forward with "I hold a copyright on this" no-one could verify this claim as well.
I somehow expect _one_ entity being specified, not possibly hundreds.
Heiko
|  |