lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2026]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 02/15] userfaultfd: introduce struct mfill_state
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 10:44:49AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 10:37:17 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 10:36:03 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a fixup (it causes a conflict in patch 4 though).
> > > Andrew, I can send v4 if you prefer.
> >
> > Looks pretty simple. "userfaultfd: introduce mfill_get_vma() and
> > mfill_put_vma()" now leaves things like this:
>
> err, actually, it gets messy.
>
> Can we please have a v4? I think there are a few other things pending?

Sent.

> I've noted
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202603311743.uZYPu1Gn-lkp@intel.com

Alice fixed this on the Rust side and the fix is queued to char-misc-linus:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAH5fLgg63SYHQ34yqy7o2cA5f2Gh0aNTwTeQkzbWb+kV4Rr3Qw@mail.gmail.com

> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/acqrtd7E6UxrX6Ji@casper.infradead.org

We've been through this since Peter's first posting and I think there's a
consensus about necessity of vm_uffd_ops and the argument was about what
exact API they should have.

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2026-04-02 06:38    [W:0.067 / U:43.498 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog