Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 2 Apr 2026 07:36:27 +0300 | | From | Mike Rapoport <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] userfaultfd: introduce struct mfill_state |
| |
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 10:44:49AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 10:37:17 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 10:36:03 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > Here's a fixup (it causes a conflict in patch 4 though). > > > Andrew, I can send v4 if you prefer. > > > > Looks pretty simple. "userfaultfd: introduce mfill_get_vma() and > > mfill_put_vma()" now leaves things like this: > > err, actually, it gets messy. > > Can we please have a v4? I think there are a few other things pending?
Sent.
> I've noted > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202603311743.uZYPu1Gn-lkp@intel.com
Alice fixed this on the Rust side and the fix is queued to char-misc-linus:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAH5fLgg63SYHQ34yqy7o2cA5f2Gh0aNTwTeQkzbWb+kV4Rr3Qw@mail.gmail.com
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/acqrtd7E6UxrX6Ji@casper.infradead.org
We've been through this since Peter's first posting and I think there's a consensus about necessity of vm_uffd_ops and the argument was about what exact API they should have.
-- Sincerely yours, Mike.
|  |