On 4/10/26 09:53, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 09:42:26AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 4/10/26 08:23, Michael Neuling wrote:
>>>
>>> It wouldn't. You're right on this and the other two. Sorry for the noise.
>>
>> Slopped-by: Cursor:claude-4.6-opus-high-thinking
>>
>> :)
> 
> It's a general tendency of LLMs to generate overly defensive code and raise
> concerns about theoretical issues.
> Maybe it's worth taking into account when writing prompts specific to
> kernel development.

Yes, and I can only urge people to actually check what the LLM spits
out, so they won't lose their credibility with maintainers ;)

-- 
Cheers,

David