Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:40:43 +0100 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add label for reserved-memory node | | From | Konrad Dybcio <> |
| |
On 3/9/26 9:08 AM, Alexander Koskovich wrote: > > On Monday, March 9th, 2026 at 4:00 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > >> On 09/03/2026 09:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 08:40:38PM +0000, Alexander Koskovich wrote: >>>> For some devices it makes more sense to just redefine reserved-memory, >>>> for example on the ASUS ROG Phone 3 it is completely different with the >>>> exception of hyp_mem, xbl_aop_mem, cmd_db and smem_mem. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Koskovich <akoskovich@pm.me> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 2 +- >>> >>> Same comment as before. This makes no sense as its own patch. >> >> And this is v2, not v1! > > Are you saying it should be fully included in the ROG 3 patch instead of being a separate change? Can just include into v2 of the ROG 3 series when I resubmit later if that's the case.
Yes
> Oops on the version, should I increment version of a patch if the contents themselves haven't changed? Or is it just for any resend of a patch, version should be incremented?
All patches in a series should have the same version tag, i.e. it's the 'series version'
Konrad
|  |