Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 4 Sep 2025 19:53:14 +0530 | | From | Neeraj Kumar <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 06/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label deletion routine |
| |
On 15/08/25 03:22PM, Dave Jiang wrote: > > >On 7/30/25 5:11 AM, Neeraj Kumar wrote: >> Added cxl v2.1 format region label deletion routine. This function is >> used to delete region label from LSA >> >> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/nvdimm/label.h | 6 +++ >> drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c | 12 +++++ >> drivers/nvdimm/nd.h | 9 ++++ >> include/linux/libnvdimm.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c >> index 94f2d0ba7aca..be18278d6cea 100644 >> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c >> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c >> @@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static int init_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, int num_labels) >> return max(num_labels, old_num_labels); >> } >> >> -static int del_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, uuid_t *uuid) >> +static int del_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, uuid_t *uuid, >> + enum label_type ltype) >> { >> struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping); >> struct nd_label_ent *label_ent, *e; >> @@ -1068,8 +1069,23 @@ static int del_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, uuid_t *uuid) >> if (!nd_label) >> continue; >> active++; >> - if (!nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, &nd_label->ns_label, uuid)) >> - continue; >> + >> + switch (ltype) { >> + case NS_LABEL_TYPE: >> + if (!nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, &nd_label->ns_label, uuid)) >> + continue; >> + >> + break; >> + case RG_LABEL_TYPE: >> + if (!rgl_uuid_equal(&nd_label->rg_label, uuid)) >> + continue; >> + >> + break; >> + default: >> + dev_err(ndd->dev, "Invalid label type\n"); >> + return 0; >> + } >> + >> active--; >> slot = to_slot(ndd, nd_label); >> nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot); >> @@ -1079,7 +1095,7 @@ static int del_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, uuid_t *uuid) >> } >> list_splice_tail_init(&list, &nd_mapping->labels); >> >> - if (active == 0) { >> + if ((ltype == NS_LABEL_TYPE) && (active == 0)) { >> nd_mapping_free_labels(nd_mapping); >> dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "no more active labels\n"); >> } >> @@ -1101,7 +1117,8 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, >> int count = 0; >> >> if (size == 0) { >> - rc = del_labels(nd_mapping, nspm->uuid); >> + rc = del_labels(nd_mapping, nspm->uuid, >> + NS_LABEL_TYPE); >> if (rc) >> return rc; >> continue; >> @@ -1268,6 +1285,56 @@ int nd_pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +int nd_pmem_region_label_delete(struct nd_region *nd_region) >> +{ >> + int i, rc; >> + struct nd_interleave_set *nd_set = nd_region->nd_set; >> + struct nd_label_ent *label_ent; >> + int ns_region_cnt = 0; > >reverse xmas tree pls
Sure Dave, I will arrange them in reverse xmas tree format.
> >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) { >> + struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i]; >> + struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping); >> + >> + /* Find non cxl format supported ndr_mappings */ >> + if (!ndd->cxl) { >> + dev_info(&nd_region->dev, "Region label unsupported\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* Find if any NS label using this region */ >> + mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock); >> + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) { >> + if (!label_ent->label) >> + continue; >> + >> + /* >> + * Check if any available NS labels has same >> + * region_uuid in LSA >> + */ >> + if (nsl_region_uuid_equal(&label_ent->label->ns_label, >> + &nd_set->uuid)) >> + ns_region_cnt++; >> + } >> + mutex_unlock(&nd_mapping->lock); >> + } >> + >> + if (ns_region_cnt) { >> + dev_dbg(&nd_region->dev, "Region/Namespace label in use\n"); >> + return -EBUSY; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) { >> + struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i]; >> + >> + rc = del_labels(nd_mapping, &nd_set->uuid, RG_LABEL_TYPE); >> + if (rc) >> + return rc; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> int __init nd_label_init(void) >> { >> WARN_ON(guid_parse(NVDIMM_BTT_GUID, &nvdimm_btt_guid)); >> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h >> index 0f428695017d..cc14068511cf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h >> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h >> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ enum { >> ND_NSINDEX_INIT = 0x1, >> }; >> >> +enum label_type { >> + RG_LABEL_TYPE, > >REGION_LABEL_TYPE preferred
Sure, I will rename it as REGION_LABEL_TYPE
> >> + NS_LABEL_TYPE, >> +}; >> + >> /** >> * struct nd_namespace_index - label set superblock >> * @sig: NAMESPACE_INDEX\0 >> @@ -235,4 +240,5 @@ struct nd_namespace_pmem; >> int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, >> struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm, resource_size_t size); >> int nd_pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region); >> +int nd_pmem_region_label_delete(struct nd_region *nd_region); >> #endif /* __LABEL_H__ */ >> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c >> index 02ae8162566c..e5c2f78ca7dd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c >> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c >> @@ -244,6 +244,18 @@ int nd_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region) >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nd_region_label_update); >> >> +int nd_region_label_delete(struct nd_region *nd_region) >> +{ >> + int rc; >> + >> + nvdimm_bus_lock(&nd_region->dev); >> + rc = nd_pmem_region_label_delete(nd_region); >> + nvdimm_bus_unlock(&nd_region->dev); >> + >> + return rc; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nd_region_label_delete); >> + >> static int nd_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, >> struct device *dev) >> { >> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h >> index 15d94e3937f0..6585747154c2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h >> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h >> @@ -322,6 +322,15 @@ static inline void nsl_set_region_uuid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, >> export_uuid(ns_label->cxl.region_uuid, uuid); >> } >> >> +static inline bool nsl_region_uuid_equal(struct nd_namespace_label *ns_label, >> + const uuid_t *uuid) >> +{ >> + uuid_t tmp; > >s/tmp/uuid/
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
Regards, Neeraj
|  |