Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 2 Sep 2025 18:12:20 -0700 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC v3 14/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split | | From | Bart Van Assche <> |
| |
On 9/2/25 6:00 PM, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2025/09/03 1:20, Bart Van Assche 写道: >> On 8/31/25 8:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote: >>> -void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio) >>> +void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio, bool split) >>> { >>> blk_cgroup_bio_start(bio); >>> blkcg_bio_issue_init(bio); >>> @@ -745,12 +745,16 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio) >>> * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio >>> method while >>> * it is active, and then process them after it returned. >>> */ >>> - if (current->bio_list) >>> - bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio); >>> - else if (!bdev_test_flag(bio->bi_bdev, BD_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO)) >>> + if (current->bio_list) { >>> + if (split && !bdev_is_zoned(bio->bi_bdev)) >>> + bio_list_add_head(¤t->bio_list[0], bio); >>> + else >>> + bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio); >> >> The above change will cause write errors for zoned block devices. As I >> have shown before, also for zoned block devices, if a bio is split >> insertion must happen at the head of the list. See e.g. >> "Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Make __submit_bio_noacct() preserve the bio >> submission order" >> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/a0c89df8-4b33-409c-ba43- >> f9543fb1b091@acm.org/) > > Do you mean we should remove the bdev_is_zoned() checking? I added this > checking because I'm not quite sure about details in zone device, and > this checking is aimed at prevent functional changes in zone device.
Yes, the bdev_is_zoned() check should be removed. I spent a significant amount of time on root-causing and proposing fixes for write errors caused by recursive bio splitting for zoned devices. What I learned by analyzing these write errors is the basis for this feedback.
> So I don't think this change will cause write errors, the write errors > should already exist before this set, right?
Agreed. Although I haven't checked this yet, if the bdev_is_zoned() check is removed from this patch, this patch should fix the write errors triggered by stacking a dm driver on top of a zoned block device if inline encryption is enabled.
Thanks,
Bart.
|  |