lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2025]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap()
Hi Miguel,

CC arnd

On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:48, Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures.
>
> Most indeed have `volatile`, but nios2 and m68k don't -- Cc'ing them
> just in case.

Indeed. Apparently the volatile keyword has not always been there...
Why does iounmap() need the volatile keyword?
Why does pci_iounmap() not have the volatile keyword?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2025-04-09 19:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog