Messages in this thread |  | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:07:56 +0200 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap() |
| |
Hi Miguel,
CC arnd
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:48, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori > <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures. > > Most indeed have `volatile`, but nios2 and m68k don't -- Cc'ing them > just in case.
Indeed. Apparently the volatile keyword has not always been there... Why does iounmap() need the volatile keyword? Why does pci_iounmap() not have the volatile keyword?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
|  |