On 4/7/25 04:25, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 08:07:03AM -0700, Dionna Amalie Glaze wrote:
>> If the GHCB is available, we should always prefer it.
> 
> I believe we should consider the cost of code duplication in this
> situation.
> 
> If the non-early version is only used in the kexec path, it will not be
> tested as frequently and could be more easily broken. I think it would be
> acceptable for kexec to be slightly slower if it results in more
> maintainable code.
> 

Is accept_memory() in the decompressor or efistub only used in the kexec
path?

Thanks,
Tom