Messages in this thread |  | | From | Miguel Ojeda <> | | Date | Mon, 1 Dec 2025 18:06:15 +0100 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: Add message to sysroot assertion |
| |
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 5:49 PM Maurice Hieronymus <mhi@mailbox.org> wrote: > > I’m still getting familiar with the mailing list workflow, so I have > Ia question regarding this. You mentioned that keeping or removing the > Icomment is fine. In cases like this, if I decide not to change the > Ipatch, should I still send a reply, or would it be picked up as-is > Ieventually? 'm just curious since I plan to contribute more in the near > Ifuture.
Sometimes maintainers can fix things when they apply a patch, but in general it always helps to send a new version to reduce their workload and the risk of making a mistake last minute (and usually saying what they modified in a [ ...] comment etc.), so thanks for the v3 :)
(By the way, there is a "I" in each line after the first in your reply.)
Cheers, Miguel
|  |