Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 29 Nov 2025 09:32:25 +0800 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] ext4: replace ext4_es_insert_extent() when caching on-disk extents | | From | Zhang Yi <> |
| |
Hi, Ted!
On 11/29/2025 12:49 AM, Theodore Tso wrote: > Thanks to Jan and Ojaswin for their comments and reviews on this patch set. > > As you may have noticed this version of the patchset is currently in > the ext4.git tree, and has shown up in linux-next.
The ext4.git tree[1] shows that only the first three patches from this v2 version have been merged, possibly because the fourth patch conflicted with ErKun's patch[2]. I've written a new version locally, adding two fix patches for the three merged patches, and then rebase the subsequent patches and modify them directly. I can send them out after texting. Is this okay?
Thanks, Yi.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/log/?h=dev [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/commit/?h=dev&id=dac092195b6a35bc7c9f11e2884cfecb1b25e20c
> > Given that we have some suggested changes, there are a couple of ways > we can handle this: > > 1) Zhang Yi could produce a new version of the patch set, and I'll > replace the v2 version of the patch set currently in the ext4.git tree > with a newer version. > > 2) We could append fix-up patches to the ext4.git tree to reflect > those changes. > > 3) I could drop the patch set entirely and we apply a later version > of the patch series after the merge window. > > What are folks' preferences? > > Thanks, > > - Ted
|  |