Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Liu, Yongxin" <> | | Subject | RE: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI buffer memory leak | | Date | Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:28:54 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 11:15 > To: Liu, Yongxin <Yongxin.Liu@windriver.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > david.e.box@linux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; andrew@lunn.ch; > platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI buffer > memory leak > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:07:30 +0000 Liu, Yongxin wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 10:56 > > > To: Liu, Yongxin <Yongxin.Liu@windriver.com> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > > > david.e.box@linux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; > > > andrew@lunn.ch; platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; > > > stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI > > > buffer memory leak > > > > > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the > > > sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:29:53 +0800 yongxin.liu@windriver.com wrote: > > > > Subject: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI > > > > buffer > > > memory leak > > > > > > Presumably typo in the subject? Why would this go via netdev/net.. ? > > > > Because the only caller of intel_pmc_ipc() is > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-intel.c. > > I have sent both to the platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org and > netdev@vger.kernel.org mailing lists. > > Just to be clear -- the CC is fine, but given the code path - the platform > maintainer will likely take this via their tree. And the subject > designation is to indicate which maintainer you're expecting to process > the patch.
Got it. If needed, I will resend with the correct subject.
Thanks, Yongxin
|  |