lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2025]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI buffer memory leak
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 11:15
> To: Liu, Yongxin <Yongxin.Liu@windriver.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> david.e.box@linux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; andrew@lunn.ch;
> platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI buffer
> memory leak
>
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:07:30 +0000 Liu, Yongxin wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 10:56
> > > To: Liu, Yongxin <Yongxin.Liu@windriver.com>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> > > david.e.box@linux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com;
> > > andrew@lunn.ch; platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org;
> > > stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI
> > > buffer memory leak
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> > > sender and know the content is safe.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:29:53 +0800 yongxin.liu@windriver.com wrote:
> > > > Subject: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI
> > > > buffer
> > > memory leak
> > >
> > > Presumably typo in the subject? Why would this go via netdev/net.. ?
> >
> > Because the only caller of intel_pmc_ipc() is
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-intel.c.
> > I have sent both to the platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org and
> netdev@vger.kernel.org mailing lists.
>
> Just to be clear -- the CC is fine, but given the code path - the platform
> maintainer will likely take this via their tree. And the subject
> designation is to indicate which maintainer you're expecting to process
> the patch.

Got it. If needed, I will resend with the correct subject.


Thanks,
Yongxin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2025-11-25 04:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog