Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:41:26 +0000 | | From | Mark Brown <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] spi: zynqmp-gqspi: Improve error recovery by resetting |
| |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > On 17/01/2025 at 13:21:58 GMT, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > If you're hitting a timeout that tends to indicate there's already a > > serious stability problem...
> Yes, unless the timeout is reached for "good reasons", ie. you request > substantial amounts of data (typically from a memory device) and the > timeout is too short compared to the theoretical time spent in the > transfer. A loaded machine can also increase the number of false > positives I guess.
I'd argue that all of those are bad reasons, I'd only expect us to time out when there's a bug - choosing too low a timeout or doing things in a way that generates timeouts under load is a problem. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |