Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 -next 00/16] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files | | From | yukaixiong <> | | Date | Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:53:53 +0800 |
| |
On 2025/1/14 21:50, Joel Granados wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 03:07:35PM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote: >> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to >> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups. >> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its >> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table. >> >> All the modifications of this patch series base on >> linux-next(tags/next-20250110). To test this patch series, the code was >> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and >> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files >> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally. > It is looking good! Here is how I think we should move it upstream: > > 1. These should queued in for 6.15 instead of the next merge window. > It is too late in the current cycle and if we put it in now, it will > not properly tested in linux-next. > > 2. I am putting this in sysctl-testing with the expectation of pushing this > up for the 6.15 merge window. Please tell me if you want this to go > through some other tree. > > Thx for the contribution > > Best
Thank you! I don't want this to go through some other tree.
Best ... >> my test steps as below listed: >> >> Step 1: Set CONFIG_SYSCTL to 'n' and compile the Linux kernel on the >> arm64 architecture. The kernel compiles successfully without any errors >> or warnings. >> > ... >> mm/swap.c | 16 ++- >> mm/swap.h | 1 + >> mm/util.c | 67 +++++++-- >> mm/vmscan.c | 23 +++ >> mm/vmstat.c | 44 +++++- >> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +- >> security/min_addr.c | 11 ++ >> 23 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
|  |