Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 20 May 2024 13:47:26 +0300 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: pxa2xx: Move PXA SSP bindings to the correct folder |
| |
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:19:51PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 2:58 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:11:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
..
> > > > SSP stands for Serial Synchronous Protocol and has nothing to do with > > > > UART, also known as USART, where 'A' stands for Asynchronous. > > > > > > > > Move the SSP bindings to where it belongs. > > > > > > It's a serial device which is also used for other applications (the > > > other one upstream being audio) so I can see where the current binding > > > comes from and it's not super obvious that spi is especially better > > > here. > > > > Hmm... okay. Then it's question to DT people. Consider this as a report. > > Because UART (aka serial) is definitely not the place for SPI/SSP bindings > > either. > > Move it when it is converted.
The problem is that somebody added a binding (in YAML) for SPI PXA2xx in the spi/ folder while this one kept unconverted.
If it dangles more, it might be that we will have two asynchronous bindings for the co-existed drivers.
> Until then, I don't care too much. SPI seems better than serial at least. > The sound part is its own binding/node (something we wouldn't do today).
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |