lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/3] pinctrl: imx: support SCMI pinctrl protocol for i.MX95
Sun, May 05, 2024 at 11:47:19AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) kirjoitti:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> The generic pinctrl-scmi.c driver could not be used for i.MX95 because
> i.MX95 SCMI firmware not supports functions, groups or generic
> 'Pin Configuration Type and Enumerations' listed in SCMI Specification.
>
> i.MX95 System Control Management Interface(SCMI) firmware only supports
> below pin configuration types which are OEM specific types:
> 192: PIN MUX
> 193: PIN CONF
> 194: DAISY ID
> 195: DAISY VAL
>
> To support Linux generic pinctrl properties(pinmux, bias-pull-[up,
> down], and etc), need extract the value from the property and map
> them to the format that i.MX95 SCMI pinctrl protocol understands,
> so add this driver.

..

> +struct imx_pin_group {
> + struct pingroup data;
> +};

I don't see the necessity of having this wrapper structure. Can't you simply
use struct pingroup directly?

..

> +static int scmi_pinctrl_imx_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
> + struct scmi_pinctrl_imx *pmx;
> + const struct scmi_handle *handle;
> + struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
> + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + const struct scmi_pinctrl_proto_ops *pinctrl_ops;

> + if (!sdev->handle)
> + return -EINVAL;

When this conditional can be true?

> + if (!of_match_node(scmi_pinctrl_imx_allowlist, np))
> + return -ENODEV;

> + handle = sdev->handle;

It's even better to assign first and then check if the above check is needed at all.

> + pinctrl_ops = handle->devm_protocol_get(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL, &ph);
> + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl_ops))
> + return PTR_ERR(pinctrl_ops);
> +
> + pmx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pmx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pmx->ph = ph;
> + pmx->ops = pinctrl_ops;
> +
> + pmx->dev = dev;
> + pmx->pctl_desc.name = DRV_NAME;
> + pmx->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + pmx->pctl_desc.pctlops = &pinctrl_scmi_imx_pinctrl_ops;
> + pmx->pctl_desc.pmxops = &pinctrl_scmi_imx_pinmux_ops;
> + pmx->pctl_desc.confops = &pinctrl_scmi_imx_pinconf_ops;
> +
> + ret = scmi_pinctrl_imx_get_pins(pmx, &pmx->pctl_desc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = scmi_pinctrl_imx_probe_dt(sdev, pmx);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(dev, &pmx->pctl_desc, pmx,
> + &pmx->pctldev);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register pinctrl\n");
> +
> + return pinctrl_enable(pmx->pctldev);
> +}

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:24    [W:0.237 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site