Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] pinctrl: k210: Deprecate SOC_CANAAN and use SOC_CANAAN_K210 | | From | Yangyu Chen <> | | Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:38:19 +0800 |
| |
> On Apr 2, 2024, at 20:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 1:13 PM Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name> wrote: > >> Since SOC_FOO should be deprecated from patch [1], and cleanup for other >> SoCs is already on the mailing list [2,3,4], we remove the use of >> SOC_CANAAN and introduced SOC_CANAAN_K210 for K210-specific drivers, >> >> Thus, we replace its drivers depends on SOC_CANAAN_K210 and default select >> when it has the symbol SOC_CANAAN_K210. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221121221414.109965-1-conor@kernel.org/ >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-praying-clad-c4fbcaa7ed0a@spud/ >> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-fled-undrilled-41dc0c46bb29@spud/ >> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-stress-earflap-d7ddb8655a4d@spud/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >
Please add Acked-by to this email [1]. I will separate them in the next revision.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/tencent_DB11214C8D0D7C48829ADA128E7BB8F13108@qq.com/
Thanks.
> Is this patch something I can just apply to the pinctrl tree? >
I think not. As Conor said.
> Yours, > Linus Walleij
|  |