Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:30:25 +0300 | From | Leon Romanovsky <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more inclusive |
| |
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series > to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now that > the approved verbiage exists in the specification. > > Compile tested, no functionality changes intended > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c | 6 ++-- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.h | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip_registers.h | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/file_ops.c | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/firmware.c | 22 ++++++------- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/pcie.c | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/qsfp.c | 36 ++++++++++----------- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_exp_rcv.c | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_twsi.c | 6 ++-- > 9 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
hfi1 and qib work perfectly fine with the current terminology. There is no need to change old code just for the sake of change.
Let's drop this patch.
Thanks
| |