lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/6] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm IPQ9574 support
From
On 02/04/2024 12:34, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_NSSCC 10
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_SNOC_0 11
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_SNOC_1 12
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PCNOC_1 13
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_QOSGEN_REF 14
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_TIMEOUT_REF 15
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_XO_DCD 16
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_ATB 17
> +#define ICC_MEM_NOC_NSSNOC 18
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_MEMNOC 19
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_MEM_NOC_1 20
> +
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PPE 0
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PPE_CFG 1
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_NSS_CSR 2
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_IMEM_QSB 3
> +#define ICC_NSSNOC_IMEM_AHB 4
> +
> +#define MASTER(x) ((ICC_ ## x) * 2)
> +#define SLAVE(x) (MASTER(x) + 1)

You already received comment to make your bindings consistent with other
Qualcomm bindings. Now you repeat the same mistake.

No, that is neither consistent nor greppble.


Best regards,
Krzysztof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 16:20    [W:0.340 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site