lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get()
Hello Stephen,

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Uwe Kleine-König (2024-03-27 00:33:10)
> > > To be able to compile drivers using devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() also
> > > on platforms without the common clk framework, add a dummy
> > > implementation that does the same as clk_rate_exclusive_get() in that
> > > case (i.e. nothing).
> > >
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com/
> > > Fixes: b0cde62e4c54 ("clk: Add a devm variant of clk_rate_exclusive_get()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> >
> > Applied to clk-fixes
>
> I assume that means it will be sent to Linus before 6.9? That would be
> great because I want to make use of this function in some drivers and
> the build bots nag about my for-next branch that in some configurations
> this function is missing.

Gentle ping. I'd like to get the patches I intend to send to Linus for
v6.10-rc1 into shape. To have these unmodified in my for-next branch for
some time it would be great to know your plans for the clk-fixes branch.
Alternatively: Can I expect the commit not to be changed any more and
pull it into my pwm tree?

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 16:47    [W:0.059 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site