lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 07/10] riscv: add ISA extension parsing for Zcmop
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:16:11PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 02:32:41PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> > > Add parsing for Zcmop ISA extension which was ratified in commit
> > > b854a709c00 ("Zcmop is ratified/1.0") of the riscv-isa-manual.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > > index b7551bad341b..cff7660de268 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > > @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
> > > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCB 77
> > > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCD 78
> > > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCF 79
> > > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCMOP 80
> > >
> > > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > index 09dee071274d..f1450cd7231e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
> > > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCB),
> > > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCD),
> > > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCF),
> > > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcmop, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCMOP),
> >
> > As per spec zcmop is dependent on zca. So perhaps below ?
> >
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCMOP, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCA)
>
> What's zicboz got to do with it, copy-pasto I guess?
> If we're gonna imply stuff like this though I think we need some
> comments explaining why it's okay.

Also, I'm inclined to call that out specifically in the binding, I've
not yet checked if dependencies actually work for elements of a string
array like the do for individual properties. I'll todo list that..
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-11 00:27    [W:1.621 / U:1.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site