Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:23:06 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] dt-bindings: ptp: Add device tree binding for IDT FemtoClock | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 10/04/2024 20:41, Min Li wrote: > From: Min Li <min.li.xe@renesas.com> > > Add device tree binding doc for the IDT FemtoClock Frequency > Clock Synthesizers.
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "device tree binding for" The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. See also: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
> > Signed-off-by: Min Li <min.li.xe@renesas.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtfc3.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
Filename based on compatible, e.g. idt,rc38xxx.yaml
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtfc3.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtfc3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtfc3.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..3e1c3135df5a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtfc3.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/ptp/ptp-idtfc3.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: RENESAS FemtoClock (TM) Frequency Clock Synthesizers > + > +maintainers: > + - Min Li <min.li.xe@renesas.com> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + # For System Synchronizer > + - idt,rc38xxx0 > + - idt,rc38xxx1 > + - idt,rc38xxx2 > + - idt,rc38xxx3 > + - idt,rc38xxx4 > + - idt,rc38xxx5 > + - idt,rc38xxx6 > + - idt,rc38xxx7 > + - idt,rc38xxx8 > + - idt,rc38xxx9
What are the "xxx"? Wild-cards? Are these compatible? Please read writing-bindings.
> + > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + description: > + I2C slave address of the device.
Drop description, it is redundant.
This looks quite incomplete. Why it cannot be part of existing idt binding?
> + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + i2c { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + phc@9 { /* FemtoClock3 */
You have totally messed indentation. What's more, this was not tested.
What is "FemtoClock3" doing here? What is it exactly?
> + compatible = "idt,rc38xxx0"; > + reg = <0x9>;
What's more, where is any user of it? What's the point of adding binding without any users? Please read submitting patches in DT bindings directory.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |