Messages in this thread | | | From | Björn Töpel <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] riscv: Implement HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS | Date | Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:15:04 +0100 |
| |
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> writes:
>> Now, I think a better approach for RISC-V would be implementing what x86 >> has (arch_ftrace_update_trampoline()), rather than CALL_OPS for RISC-V. >> >> Thoughts? > > I am going to spin some patches for implementing > arch_ftrace_update_trampoline() for > RISC-V, then we can compare the two approaches and see which is > better. But I agree > that arch_ftrace_update_trampoline() is a better approach given that > we can jump anywhere > with auipc/jalr.
Yup, and the text size wont blow up.
Cheers, Björn
| |