Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Mar 2024 10:38:23 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v0 02/14] drm/amdgpu,drm/radeon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive | From | Easwar Hariharan <> |
| |
On 3/29/2024 10:28 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > On 3/29/2024 10:16 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: >> Hi Easwar, >>
<snip>
>> >> The specification talks about: >> >> - master -> controller >> - slave -> target (and not client) >> >> But both you and Wolfram have used client. I'd like to reach >> some more consistency here. > > I had the impression that remote targets (i.e external to the device) were to be called clients, > e.g. the QSFP FRUs in drivers/infiniband, and internal ones targets. > I chose the terminology according to that understanding, but now I can't find where I got that > information. > > Thanks, > Easwar
Ah, it was in Wolfram's individual commit messages "They are also more specific because we distinguish now between a remote entity ("client") and a local one ("target")."
Thanks, Easwar
| |