lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/22] um: virt-pci: drop owner assignment
From
On 27/03/2024 14:34, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 13:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.
>
>> All further patches depend on the first virtio patch, therefore please ack
>> and this should go via one tree: virtio?
>
> Sure. Though it's not really actually necessary, you can set it in the
> core and merge the other patches in the next cycle; those drivers that
> _have_ an .owner aren't broken after all.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>

True, this can be spread over two cycles. What I wanted to express, is
that maintainers should not pick individual patches.

Thanks for the Ack and apologies for a bit too big CC-list. I need to
learn how to ask b4 to make Cc-per-patch for such case.



Best regards,
Krzysztof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 16:12    [W:3.698 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site