Messages in this thread |  | | From | Uros Bizjak <> | | Date | Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:01:15 +0100 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] x86/stackprotector/64: Remove stack protector test script |
| |
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 5:52 PM Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote: > > This test for the stack protector was added in 2006 to make sure the > compiler had the PR28281 patch applied. With GCC 5.1 being the minimum > supported compiler now, it is no longer necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 ++--- > scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh | 4 ---- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > delete mode 100755 scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > index f326903cbe67..88d72227e3cb 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > @@ -411,12 +411,11 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS > > config CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR > bool > - default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS)) if 64BIT > + default y if 64BIT > default $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard-reg=fs -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=__stack_chk_guard) > help > We have to make sure stack protector is unconditionally disabled if > - the compiler produces broken code or if it does not let us control > - the segment on 32-bit kernels. > + the compiler does not allow control of the segment and symbol. > > menu "Processor type and features" > > diff --git a/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh b/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh > deleted file mode 100755 > index 75e4e22b986a..000000000000 > --- a/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ > -#!/bin/sh > -# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > - > -echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $* -S -x c -c -m64 -O0 -mcmodel=kernel -fno-PIE -fstack-protector - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%gs" > -- > 2.44.0 >
|  |