lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree
Hi all,

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:09:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 853f96367535 ("LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support")
>
> from the loongarch tree and commit:
>
> f48212ee8e78 ("treewide: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM")
>
> from the kvm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 99a0a15ce5f7,eb2139387a54..000000000000
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@@ -133,11 -133,8 +133,10 @@@ config LOONGARC
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - select HAVE_KVM
> + select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
> select HAVE_NMI
> + select HAVE_OBJTOOL if AS_HAS_EXPLICIT_RELOCS
> select HAVE_PCI
> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> select HAVE_PERF_REGS

This is now a conflict between the loongarch tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 15:52    [W:0.050 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site